In a case where the range runs from six years to life, the argument is rarely about whether a death occurred. It is about intent, about causation, and about whether the aggravating features in part 2 of Article 105 genuinely exist or have simply been asserted.
Evgeny works on that boundary: the line between murder and grievous harm resulting in death, the line between an attack and a defence that exceeded its limits, and the admissibility of a confession taken in the first hours from someone who had neither a lawyer of their choosing nor an adequate interpreter.
